How does green patriarchy shape climate Action? A critical analysis on gendered inequities in climate solutions (Record no. 531810)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03147nam a22001457a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 251021b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Kolloju, Naveen Junuguru, Srinivas Pandit, Aabha and Jagannathan, Maitreyi
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title How does green patriarchy shape climate Action? A critical analysis on gendered inequities in climate solutions
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 81(3), Sep, 2025: p.268-287
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Women, particularly in the Global South, are more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change due to their social, economic, and cultural responsibilities. However, their knowledge and contributions are often overlooked in mainstream climate policies and discussions. This exclusion highlights deep-rooted gender power structures commonly referred to as ‘green patriarchy’. This critical review explores how green patriarchy influences climate action and sustains gender inequities in climate solutions. It addresses three research questions: (a) How does green patriarchy appear in climate governance? (b) What barriers prevent women from participating in climate decision-making? (c) How can gender-focused policies improve climate justice? Using a qualitative, interpretive approach, the study analyses peer-reviewed literature, feminist political ecology theories and reports from organisations such as the UNFCCC, the IPCC and the UN. Through thematic and content analysis, it examines gendered policy design, participation challenges and strategies for equitable climate action. The findings show that green patriarchy, embedded in technocratic and market-based solutions like carbon trading and geoengineering, favours male-dominated perspectives, marginalising women’s knowledge. Examples, such as the Noel Kempff Project in Bolivia and adaptation policies in Aotearoa of New Zealand, highlight how these approaches exclude women, weakening climate resilience. Key barriers include unequal access to resources, low representation in global forums, and cultural norms that limit women’s role, worsening issues like health risks and economic insecurity. The study calls for intersectional and decolonial approaches to reshape climate governance. It recommends increasing women’s representation, ensuring gender-sensitive funding and incorporating indigenous knowledge and care ethics into policies to build stronger, fairer climate responses. In conclusion, overcoming green patriarchy requires more than inclusion, it demands transformative change. By prioritising women’s voices, leadership and grassroots efforts, climate policies can become equitable and sustainable, addressing gender injustices and advancing climate justice while respecting diverse ecological knowledge and lived experiences for a just climate future.- Reproduced

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09749284251348532
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Climate change, Climate governance, Green patriarchy, Gendered climate inequities, Feminist climate justice, Intersectional climate policy.
9 (RLIN) 57484
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2025-10-21 81(3), Sep, 2025: p.268-287 AR137448 2025-10-21 Articles

Powered by Koha