Who can have a baby? Social norms and the right to reproduce (Record no. 533039)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02193nam a22001337a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 260420b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Marteleto, Letícia J. Kumar, Sneha Sereno, Luiz Gustavo Fernandes and Maia, Alexandre Gori
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Who can have a baby? Social norms and the right to reproduce
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc American Sociological Review
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 90(6), Dec, 2025: p.1060-1091
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Childbearing norms and discourse influence social interactions and policy priorities, reflecting and reinforcing social stratification. We propose a theoretical framework that systematically explains stratification and discrimination in childbearing norms. The theory of socially sanctioned reproduction (TSSR) emphasizes how childbearing and reproductive norms are shaped by individual and intersectional attributes of both evaluators and those evaluated, underscoring multidimensionality and intersectionality in childbearing norms. We empirically examine this theory through paired conjoint survey experiments with a population-based sample of women ages 18 to 34 in Pernambuco, Brazil—a highly unequal, multiracial context. In our novel application, respondents assessed profiles of hypothetical married women with randomly varying attributes and reported whether they were well-suited for childbearing. Findings show how intersectional attributes and in-group/out-group dynamics, principally along race and SES lines, define childbearing norms. Black women receive less approval if in low- versus high-SES positions, whereas White women receive similar levels of approval regardless of SES. We find that these discriminatory patterns are shaped by the social attributes of evaluators themselves, suggesting othering and group attachment processes. Our theoretical and empirical frameworks can be extended to study norms in other highly contested areas of reproductive and family life.- Reproduced


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00031224251387273?_gl=1*18ma0lz*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTIxNjEwNDU1NS4
xNzc
2Njc2MDIx*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3NzY2NzYwMjEkbzEkZzEkdDE3NzY2NzYwNDQkajM3JGwwJGgyMzE2MDcyNTg.
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Sociological Review
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2026-04-20 90(6), Dec, 2025: p.1060-1091 AR138551 2026-04-20 Articles

Powered by Koha