Mixed ignals? Rethinking how ideology and institutional motivations shape the solicitor general’s positions (Record no. 533046)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01635nam a22001337a 4500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 260421b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Widner, Kirsten and Lane, Elizabeth A
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Mixed ignals? Rethinking how ideology and institutional motivations shape the solicitor general’s positions
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Political Research Quarterly
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 78(4), Dec, 2025: p.1220-1236
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc The Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) wins more cases before the US Supreme Court than any other party. Recent scholarship shows that justices are most likely to side with the OSG when its position is ideologically aligned with justices’ predispositions and when the OSG takes a position counter its own presumed preferences. However, previous studies fail to account for how the institutional role of the OSG shapes what should be considered a counter-preference signal. We offer a new approach to defining the OSG’s preferences and test our assumptions using cases argued before the Court from 1979 to 2018. We show it is more common for the OSG to act against its ideological predispositions than its institutional interests, and it is exceedingly rare for it to act against both. We find the effects of counter-interest signals are context dependent and may be less important than ideological congruence and institutional concerns.-Reproduced


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129251348456?_gl=1*118usw1*_up*MQ..*_ga*MjMzNjk2NTEzLjE3NzY3NTE
3ODE.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3NzY3NTE3ODAkbzEkZzEkdDE3NzY3NTE4MDQkajM2JGwwJGgyNTQ0NDIwNjg.
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Political Research Quarterly
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Item type Articles
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Permanent location Current location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Koha item type
          Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2026-04-21 78(4), Dec, 2025: p.1220-1236 AR138558 2026-04-21 Articles

Powered by Koha