Promoting equity in higher education: How valid are the arguments against the UGC equity regulations, 2026? (Record no. 533200)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01025nam a22001337a 4500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 260429b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Thorat, Sukhadeo |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Promoting equity in higher education: How valid are the arguments against the UGC equity regulations, 2026? |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc | Economic & Political Weekly |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 61(11), Mar 14, 2026: p.33-43 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | The University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 were met with protests and were subsequently kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court. However, it is pertinent to ask whether the objections raised against the 2026 regulations are valid. Such a question can be best answered by tracing the evolution of the 2026 regulations and their necessity. Further, the limitations of the 2026 regulations must also be tackled.-Reproduced https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/11/special-articles/promoting-equity-higher-education.html |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Main entry heading | Economic & Political Weekly |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Item type | Articles |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Permanent location | Current location | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Public Administration | Indian Institute of Public Administration | 2026-04-29 | 61(11), Mar 14, 2026: p.33-43 | AR138712 | 2026-04-29 | Articles |