| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
02014pab a2200169 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180718b2002 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Winskel, Mark |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
When systems are overthrown: the `Dash for Gas' in the British electricity supply industry |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2002 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
p.563-98. |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Aug |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
The privatization of the British electricity supply industry (ESI) in the late 1980s and early 1990s was associated with a transformation in electricity generation technology. In a sudden and unexpected `Dash for Gas', previously unused combined cycle gas turbine plant was adopted for all new large power stations. Gas turbine technology, politically and institutionally excluded from the industry before privatiztion, gained ascendancy due to the coincidence and interaction of ESI liberalization with lower fuel prices and greater availability, improved turbine performance, pollution abatement legislation, and the manifestation of institutional tensions accumulated under nationalization. An earlier paper found that the demise of established generation technology, particularly the British nuclear power programme, exposed the inadequacies of autonomistic and deterministic notions of technlogical change.The present paper considers the value of a more subtle framework - Hughes' sociotechnical systems model - for analyzing the rise of gas turbines in the British ESI.The systems perspective enables the `Dash for Gas' to be understood, rather than as a result of technical and economic imperatives, or structural and regulatory reform, as a contingent and largely unplanned outcome of the interplay of previously excluded international forces with latent local interests,mediated by policy making expediency. Liberalization swiftlyled to the replacement of centralized system building with fragmented `postmodern' change. - Reproduced. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Power industry - Great Britain |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Power industry |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Social Studies of Science |
| 909 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
54853 |
