The Washington consensus and beyond (Record no. 55992)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02433pab a2200169 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b2003 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Williamson, John
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The Washington consensus and beyond
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2003
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.1475-481.
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation 12 Apr
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The term `Washington Consensus', which emerged in 1989 as a by-product of a historically unusual degree of consensus that Latin American countries needed to stabilise, to open up their economies to trade and FDI and to liberalise, has proved controversial right from the start. Most opponents of the Washington Consensus appear to have used the term in recent years to mean universal application of the neoliberal interpretation of the term. Perhaps this usage was to some extent legitimised by the fact that at least for a period in the 1990s some of the Washington institutions - the IMF and key agencies of the US government like the Treasury - did indeed urge parts of this extended agenda, most damagingly a pace of capital account liberalisation that most people agree in retrospect to have been precipitate. But even if the Washington Consensus is absolved of responsibility for provoking crises, it is true that outcomes in Latin America have disappointed in the last decade, including in many countries that have stablished, liberalised, and opened up. This suggested that the time was ripe for taking another look at the policy agenda of the region. The results of this effort are being published in after the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America (Kuczynski and Williamson 2003). The focus is on Latin America, but the history of the Washington Consensus suggests that one needs to ask if the thoughts could be of wider relevance. Obviously they will need amending to suit the circumstances of a particular country. The author has classified the new reform agenda into four big themes: crisis-proofing; completing (and, where necessary, correcting) the `first-generation' liberalising reforms that constituted the core of the Washington Consensus; Complementing them with `second-generation (institutional) reforms; and broadening the reform agenda to include a concern with income distribution. This paper is devoted to sketching these four themes. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Economic growth - United states
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Economic growth
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Economic and Political Weekly
909 ## -
-- 55992
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 38, Issue no: 15 AR56437 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha