| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01171pab a2200169 454500 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180718b2003 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Beetham, David et al. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Democratic audit: towards a broader view of democratic achievement |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2003 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
p.334-47. |
| 362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION |
|---|
| Dates of publication and/or sequential designation |
Apr |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
How democratic is Britain? Using data collected by Democratic Audit, this article argues that Britain's progress towards democracy has been uneven in 2002. It assesses a wide range of areas, including the state of civil and political rights, the promotion of economic and social rights, elections and voter participation, party democracy, the effectiveness and responsiveness of government, the role of women in public life, devolution, and the state of civil society. The authors conclude that the major lesson to be learned is that democracy is a never-ending process and that a major weakness of New Labour's approach is that it is unfocused and lacks a clear definition and understanding of democratic principles. - Reproduced. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Democracy - Great Britain |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
Democracy |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Main entry heading |
Parliamentary Affairs |
| 909 ## - |
|---|
| -- |
56510 |
