Challenges to the impartiality of state supreme courts: legitimacy theory and "New-Style" judicial campaigns (Record no. 79025)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01850pab a2200169 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b2008 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Gibson, James L.
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Challenges to the impartiality of state supreme courts: legitimacy theory and "New-Style" judicial campaigns
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2008
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.59-75.
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Feb
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Institutional legitimacy is perhaps the most important political capital courts possess. Many believe, however, that the legitimacy of elected state courts is being threatened by the rise of politicized judicial election campaigns and the breakdown of judicial impartiality. three features of such campaigns, the argument goes, are dangerous to the perceived impartiality of courts; campaign contributions, attack ads, and policy pronouncements by candidates for judicial office. By means of an experimental vignette embedded in a representative survey, I investigate whether these factors in fact compromise the legitimacy of courts. The survey data indicate that campaign contributions and attack ads do indeed lead to a diminution of legitimacy, in courts just as in legislatures. However, policy pronouncements, even those promising to make decisions in certain ways, have no impact whatsoever on the legitimacy of courts and judges. These results are strongly reinforced by the experiment's ability to compare the effects of these campaign factors across institutions (a state Supreme Court and a state legislature). Thus, this analysis demonstrates that legitimacy is not obdurate and that campaign activity can indeed deplete the reservoir of goodwill courts typically enjoy, even if the culprit is not the free-speech rights the US Supreme Court announced in 2002. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Judiciary
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading American Political Science Review
908 ## - PUT COMMAND PARAMETER (RLIN)
Put command parameter N
909 ## -
-- 79025
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 102, Issue no: 1 AR79485 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha