Administrative reform in China's central government - how much `learning from the west'? (Record no. 80213)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02616pab a2200193 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b2008 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Christensen, Tom
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Administrative reform in China's central government - how much `learning from the west'?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2008
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.351-71.
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Sep
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The prevailing interpretation in the scholarly literature is that public sector reform in China during the period of marketization has been driven primarily by internal, contextual factors rather than being under the sway of particular global reform models or theories such as New Public Management. the aim of this article is to move beyond arguing from inference that `Chinese characteristics' continue to be dominant and to inquire into the manner and extent of external influences on central government reform actors. We assume a `multi-causal' model in which both internal and external factors are present. From a survey of the literature on the reforms, we conclude that, while there are some `unique' features, most of the themes (and even the results) of modern Chinese reforms are not unique and have parrells in Western countries. Moreover, aside from the similarities in the content and substance of administrative reforms, the patterns and styles of reform in China and in the West in the past 20 years show marked similarities and parallels. Thus, external reform ideas and influences are being diffused through reform processes. Further empirical and theoretical analysis is required to establish the more specific nature of scanning and dissemination, or other forms of diffusion; the kind of learning that is taking place; and the impact that any imported models or templates actually have on reform proposals and outcomes in particular reform episodes. Points for practitioners: Whereas many scholars tend to believe the lip service the Chinese leaders pay to the `uniqueness' of China's public sector reforms and their `Chinese characteristics', their leaders have been very eager to `learn from the West'. Emulation and learning at a global level are key aspects of contemporary public sector innovation and reform, even between jurisdictions that are seemingly very different from each other. The development of sophisticated mechanisms for scanning and selective learning are key requirements for a rapidly developing public sector such as China's. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Administrative reform
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Painter, Martin
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Lisheng, Dong
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading International Review of Administrative Science
908 ## - PUT COMMAND PARAMETER (RLIN)
Put command parameter N
909 ## -
-- 80213
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 74, Issue no: 3 AR80673 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha