Privatisation and the boundaries of judicial review (Record no. 91550)

000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 01672pab a2200181 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 180718b2011 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hoehn, Felix
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Privatisation and the boundaries of judicial review
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2011
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent p.73-95.
362 ## - DATES OF PUBLICATION AND/OR SEQUENTIAL DESIGNATION
Dates of publication and/or sequential designation Mar
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Can a public authority avoid public law requirements, such as obligation to act fairly, b y "contracting out" the performance of its functions? In Societe de I'assurance automobile du Quebec v. Cyr, the Supreme Court of Canada said "no", but it did not explain how far the Court will move the boundaries of judicial review to adapt to the growth of the private role in governance. However, there is reason to believe that the Court is moving towards a functional approach in defining state power and the location of the boundary between public and private law. This promises to be more coherent and effective than the piecemeal functional approaches that have emerged in the United States and the United Kingdom. A functional approach will prevent the lines of legal accountability to Parliament, the legislatures, the electorate and the courts from being severed by a contract between a public authority and a private party. At the same time, the emerging functional approach accepts that public law remedies should generally not be available if private law offers an adequate remedy or if applying public law would generate disproportionate costs to efficiency or would damage other public law objectives or private interests. - Reproduced.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Privatisation
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Judiciary
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Main entry heading Canadian Public Administration
908 ## - PUT COMMAND PARAMETER (RLIN)
Put command parameter N
909 ## -
-- 91550
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Permanent Location Current Location Date acquired Serial Enumeration / chronology Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Indian Institute of Public Administration Indian Institute of Public Administration 2018-07-19 Volume no: 54, Issue no: 1 AR92010 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 Articles

Powered by Koha