Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Exam-centred meritocracy in Taiwan: hiring by merit or examination?

By: So, Bennis Wai Yip.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2015Description: p.312-323.Subject(s): Technocracy - Taiwan | Examinations - Taiwan | Civil service - Taiwan | Civil service In: Australian Journal of Public AdministrationSummary: As a legacy of Imperial China, the Taiwan civil service entrance examination (CSEE) represents the hallmark of a unique exam-centred meritocracy, in which government agencies and public managers are deprived of selection power. This system diverges from the trend of managerialism in Anglo-Saxon countries. This paper argues that the evolution of meritocracy in Taiwan has been built around the CSEE and has contributed to a top-down state-building approach. The current system is a product of a long-term power struggle among the Examination Yuan, government agencies, and civil service examinees. In contrast to the popular framework of patronage versus merit, the policy debate in Taiwan is better framed as whether or not recruitments are made on the basis of competitive examination. The value of ムequalityメ is upheld at the expense of the value of competence. - Reprodu
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 74, Issue no: 3 Available AR109711

As a legacy of Imperial China, the Taiwan civil service entrance examination (CSEE) represents the hallmark of a unique exam-centred meritocracy, in which government agencies and public managers are deprived of selection power. This system diverges from the trend of managerialism in Anglo-Saxon countries. This paper argues that the evolution of meritocracy in Taiwan has been built around the CSEE and has contributed to a top-down state-building approach. The current system is a product of a long-term power struggle among the Examination Yuan, government agencies, and civil service examinees. In contrast to the popular framework of patronage versus merit, the policy debate in Taiwan is better framed as whether or not recruitments are made on the basis of competitive examination. The value of ムequalityメ is upheld at the expense of the value of competence. - Reprodu

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha