Normal view MARC view ISBD view

A discipline in the shadow of the state public administration in post-Mao China.

By: Tao-Chiu Lam.
Contributor(s): Hoi-Kwo K. Wong.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 1996Description: p.179-210.Subject(s): Public administration - China | Public administration In: International Journal of Public AdministrationSummary: "This article examines the main features of the development of the discipline of public administration in post-Mao China. It places the growth of the discipline and its main characteristics and problems in China's statist context and the current search for a new economic order engineered by the state. Two broad issues are examined in depth. First, it discusses the subservient status of the discipline to the state in an institutional context. Second, this article interprets the substantive concerns of the discipline of public administration in China in terms of its heavy dependence on the state. While the direct involvement of the state has led to the rehabilitation and greatly contributed to the re-emergence of the discipline after it was banned for three decades, it has, paradoxically, hindered the development of the discipline into a reflective, autonomous and mature field of academic pursuit"
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 19, Issue no: 2 Available AR31127

"This article examines the main features of the development of the discipline of public administration in post-Mao China. It places the growth of the discipline and its main characteristics and problems in China's statist context and the current search for a new economic order engineered by the state. Two broad issues are examined in depth. First, it discusses the subservient status of the discipline to the state in an institutional context. Second, this article interprets the substantive concerns of the discipline of public administration in China in terms of its heavy dependence on the state. While the direct involvement of the state has led to the rehabilitation and greatly contributed to the re-emergence of the discipline after it was banned for three decades, it has, paradoxically, hindered the development of the discipline into a reflective, autonomous and mature field of academic pursuit"

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha