Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Factors versus composites: guidelines for choosing the right structural equation modeling method

By: Hair, Joseph F. and Sarstedt, Marko.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Project Management Journal Description: 50(6), 2019: p.619-624 .Subject(s): Composites, Factors, Partial least squares (PLS), Structural equation modeling (SEM) In: Project Management Journal Summary: Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a widely applied and useful tool for project management scholars. In this Thoughtlet article, we critically reflect on the measurement philosophy underlying the two streams of SEM and their adequacy for estimating relationships among concepts commonly encountered in the field (e.g., team performance). We also discuss considerations to ponder when making the choice between the two types of SEM as well as between SEM and regression analysis.- Reproduced
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
50(6), 2019: p. 619-624 Available AR123311

Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a widely applied and useful tool for project management scholars. In this Thoughtlet article, we critically reflect on the measurement philosophy underlying the two streams of SEM and their adequacy for estimating relationships among concepts commonly encountered in the field (e.g., team performance). We also discuss considerations to ponder when making the choice between the two types of SEM as well as between SEM and regression analysis.- Reproduced

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha