Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Japan and the United States as development models: classifying Asia Pacific and Latin American political economics

By: Chan, Steve.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2001Description: p.1134-58.Subject(s): Economic and social development In: Comparative Political StudiesSummary: According to Femando Fajnzylber, the political economies of Japan and the United States present distinct characteristics in areas such as their consumption patterns, income distribution, trade orientation, and economic dynamism. These characteristics provide a model for emulation by their East Asian and Latin American neighbors, respectively. Although some of the attributions and associations alleged seem obvious, others are more questionable and controversial. This article employs cluster methodology to undertake an empirical analysis with the aim of classifying and delineating the relevant political economies. Contrary to expectation, there is scant support for the proposition that Japan and the United States present two divergent prototypes of a development model. Similarly, the Latin American countries have not followed the US model of development as hypothesized, although they do differ sharply from the East Asian political economies. - Reproduced.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 34, Issue no: 10 Available AR52170

According to Femando Fajnzylber, the political economies of Japan and the United States present distinct characteristics in areas such as their consumption patterns, income distribution, trade orientation, and economic dynamism. These characteristics provide a model for emulation by their East Asian and Latin American neighbors, respectively. Although some of the attributions and associations alleged seem obvious, others are more questionable and controversial. This article employs cluster methodology to undertake an empirical analysis with the aim of classifying and delineating the relevant political economies. Contrary to expectation, there is scant support for the proposition that Japan and the United States present two divergent prototypes of a development model. Similarly, the Latin American countries have not followed the US model of development as hypothesized, although they do differ sharply from the East Asian political economies. - Reproduced.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha