“I have learned my lesson”: How clients' trust betrayals shape the future ways in which street-level bureaucrats cope with their clients
By: Davidovitz, Maayan and Cohen, Nissim
.
Material type: 
BookPublisher: Public Administration: An International Quarterly Description: 10(1), Mar, 2023: p.335-351.
In:
Public Administration: An International QuarterlySummary: Trust betrayal is a subjective feeling of a street-level bureaucrat (SLB) that a client acted contrary to expectations, diminishing the former's belief in the latter's good intentions. How do SLBs experience a betrayal of trust by clients? How do such betrayals shape the future ways in which SLBs cope with clients? We investigate these questions empirically using semi-structured, in-depth interviews and focus groups with Israeli social service providers. The findings reveal four types of client trust betrayal: integrity-based, previous impression-based, legitimate behavior-based, and category-based. We identify five strategies SLBs employ to cope with clients following such betrayals. With specific clients who betrayed their trust, they adopt minimal, formal, and guarded behavior; they satisfy the client's demands; they sever the relationship with the client entirely. With future clients, they exhibit careful, less “naïve” behavior and adopt a boundary-setting approach. The negative implications for public service delivery may be far-reaching.- Reproduced
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12769
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 10(1), Mar, 2023: p.335-351 | Available | AR130228 |
Trust betrayal is a subjective feeling of a street-level bureaucrat (SLB) that a client acted contrary to expectations, diminishing the former's belief in the latter's good intentions. How do SLBs experience a betrayal of trust by clients? How do such betrayals shape the future ways in which SLBs cope with clients? We investigate these questions empirically using semi-structured, in-depth interviews and focus groups with Israeli social service providers. The findings reveal four types of client trust betrayal: integrity-based, previous impression-based, legitimate behavior-based, and category-based. We identify five strategies SLBs employ to cope with clients following such betrayals. With specific clients who betrayed their trust, they adopt minimal, formal, and guarded behavior; they satisfy the client's demands; they sever the relationship with the client entirely. With future clients, they exhibit careful, less “naïve” behavior and adopt a boundary-setting approach. The negative implications for public service delivery may be far-reaching.- Reproduced
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12769
There are no comments for this item.