Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Asking versus telling: The supreme court’s strategic use of questions and statements during oral arguments

By: Sorenson, Maron W.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Political Research Quarterly Description: 76(4), Dec, 2023: p.1559-1572. In: Political Research QuarterlySummary: Supreme Court oral arguments are often characterized as the Court rapidly firing questions at attorneys who struggle to keep up; however, nearly half of the Court’s utterances come not as questions but as statements. I ask whether patterns of questioning and commenting behavior during oral arguments can predict case outcomes and justice votes. To answer this question, I develop a theory of strategic communication that accounts for the differential ways justices—and other strategic actors—use queries and comments during arguments. Using transcripts from 1981 to 2019, I code for use of questions and statements, finding the two theoretically and empirically distinct: where questions increase a party’s chances of winning, statements increase their chance of losing.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129231164604
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
76(4), Dec, 2023: p.1559-1572 Available AR131206

Supreme Court oral arguments are often characterized as the Court rapidly firing questions at attorneys who struggle to keep up; however, nearly half of the Court’s utterances come not as questions but as statements. I ask whether patterns of questioning and commenting behavior during oral arguments can predict case outcomes and justice votes. To answer this question, I develop a theory of strategic communication that accounts for the differential ways justices—and other strategic actors—use queries and comments during arguments. Using transcripts from 1981 to 2019, I code for use of questions and statements, finding the two theoretically and empirically distinct: where questions increase a party’s chances of winning, statements increase their chance of losing.- Reproduced

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129231164604

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha