Masculinity, embodiment and identity-work: How do organisational members use their bodies as identity resources to (re) accomplish hegemonic masculinity?
By: Giazitzoglu, Andreas
.
Material type:
BookPublisher: Organization Description: 31(1), Jan, 2024: p.139-162.Subject(s): Hegemonic Masculinity in Rugby , Rugby Organisation Hyper-Masculinity Ethnographic Research Hegemonic Masculine Ideals Identity-Threat Organisational Collective Embodied Remedial Identity-Work Identity-Resource Symbolic Maintenance Organisational Identity Normative Organisational Ideals Vulnerability to Identity Threats Exclusion Embodiment Gender Hegemony Integration Sociology of Sports and Gender| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 31(1), Jan, 2024: p.139-162 | Available | AR131396 |
This article focuses on a rugby organisation, in which a distinct configuration of hyper-masculinity exists as the hegemonic one. Using three storified accounts that emerged during ethnographic research, empirics show that when a player’s body fails to align him with hegemonic masculine ideals, he encounters an identity-threat and a separation from the organisational collective. In turn, a player participates in embodied remedial identity-work processes, to (re)accomplish hegemonic masculinity and (re)integrate with the organisational collective, using his body as an identity-resource to counter the identity-threat. Empirics reveals the extent to which the body underpins expressions of hegemonic masculinity, and how important the body is as a site that is used to symbolically maintain a viable organisational identity. Ontologically, it is emphasised that men whose bodies appear to fit normative organisational ideals do not necessarily encounter the embodied aspects of their organisational experiences unproblematically; rather, their bodies – like those of less normative actors – are vulnerable to identity threats and a source of exclusion. This encourages scholars to think about the relationship between embodiment, gender, hegemony and integration in organisational settings in more nuanced ways.-Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13505084221074041


Articles
There are no comments for this item.