Devinatz, Victor G.
By: Devinatz, Victor G
.
Material type: 
BookPublisher: Administrative Science Quarterly Description: 69(1), Mar, 2024: p.6-9.
In:
Administrative Science QuarterlySummary: The advent of Taylorism, which reached its apex of U.S. influence during the 1910s, and Fordism, which dominated U.S. manufacturing from the 1920s through the 1960s, resulted in dramatic increases in productivity and profitability for employers. The earliest labor process studies, which were based on Harry Braverman’s 1974 classic, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, argued that Taylorism’s implementation led simultaneously to work intensification and degradation for manual workers and to greater managerial production process control. Beginning in the 1970s, as U.S. Fordist production regimes transitioned to post-Fordism, which was characterized by approaches to lean production, many labor studies scholars who were critical of the U.S. trade union movement’s business unionism (such as Kim Moody, Mike Parker, and Jane Slaughter) viewed this new production regime as nothing more than an augmented. Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00018392231199794
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 69(1), Mar, 2024: p.6-9 | Available | AR132416 |
The advent of Taylorism, which reached its apex of U.S. influence during the 1910s, and Fordism, which dominated U.S. manufacturing from the 1920s through the 1960s, resulted in dramatic increases in productivity and profitability for employers. The earliest labor process studies, which were based on Harry Braverman’s 1974 classic, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, argued that Taylorism’s implementation led simultaneously to work intensification and degradation for manual workers and to greater managerial production process control. Beginning in the 1970s, as U.S. Fordist production regimes transitioned to post-Fordism, which was characterized by approaches to lean production, many labor studies scholars who were critical of the U.S. trade union movement’s business unionism (such as Kim Moody, Mike Parker, and Jane Slaughter) viewed this new production regime as nothing more than an augmented. Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00018392231199794
There are no comments for this item.