Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The politics of policing hate: Boundary work, social inequalities, and legitimacy

By: Solhjell, Randi and Klatran, Henning Kaiser.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Social & Legal Studies Description: 33(4), Aug, 2024: p.620-641.Subject(s): Hate crime, Police, Norway, Legitimacy, Social inequalities, Boundary work In: Social & Legal StudiesSummary: This article investigates how police officers and prosecutors make sense of and speak about their work with hate crimes. Our analysis rests upon Robert Reiner's widely acknowledged claim that policing is inherently political. We identified three core issues that illustrate the political nature of policing hate crimes. First, the politically contingent boundary work of distinguishing criminal from legal acts. Second, the impact of the enforcement of hate crime laws on the reproduction of social inequalities. Third, the “diversity politics” of gaining legitimacy and trust among minorities, which hate crime legislation is meant to protect. While a strong commitment to policing hate crimes is evident among our interviewees, we ask if the politically invested discourse they present may contribute to an absence of critical reflections regarding the limited effect of law enforcement, as well as a lack of engagement with pressing concerns regarding racialized crime control and racism.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09646639231201912
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
33(4), Aug, 2024: p.620-641 Available AR133206

This article investigates how police officers and prosecutors make sense of and speak about their work with hate crimes. Our analysis rests upon Robert Reiner's widely acknowledged claim that policing is inherently political. We identified three core issues that illustrate the political nature of policing hate crimes. First, the politically contingent boundary work of distinguishing criminal from legal acts. Second, the impact of the enforcement of hate crime laws on the reproduction of social inequalities. Third, the “diversity politics” of gaining legitimacy and trust among minorities, which hate crime legislation is meant to protect. While a strong commitment to policing hate crimes is evident among our interviewees, we ask if the politically invested discourse they present may contribute to an absence of critical reflections regarding the limited effect of law enforcement, as well as a lack of engagement with pressing concerns regarding racialized crime control and racism.- Reproduced

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09646639231201912

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha