Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Monopolization with must-haves

By: Ide, Enrique and Montero, Juan-Pablo.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Description: 16(3), Aug, 2024: p.284-320. In: American Economic Journal: MicroeconomicsSummary: An increasing number of monopolization cases have been constructed around the notion of "must-have" items: products that distributors must carry to "compete effectively." Motivated by these cases, we consider a multiproduct setting where upstream suppliers sell their products through competing distributors offering one-stop-shopping convenience to consumers. We show the emergence of products that distributors cannot afford not to carry if their rivals do. A supplier of such products can exploit this must-have property, along with tying and exclusivity provisions, to monopolize adjacent, otherwise-competitive markets. Policy interventions that ban tying or exclusivity provisions may prove ineffective or even backfire.- Reproduced https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20230018
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
16(3), Aug, 2024: p.284-32 Available AR133221

An increasing number of monopolization cases have been constructed around the notion of "must-have" items: products that distributors must carry to "compete effectively." Motivated by these cases, we consider a multiproduct setting where upstream suppliers sell their products through competing distributors offering one-stop-shopping convenience to consumers. We show the emergence of products that distributors cannot afford not to carry if their rivals do. A supplier of such products can exploit this must-have property, along with tying and exclusivity provisions, to monopolize adjacent, otherwise-competitive markets. Policy interventions that ban tying or exclusivity provisions may prove ineffective or even backfire.- Reproduced

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20230018

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha