Thermometer or sauna?: performance measurement and democratic assistance in the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
By: Hirschmann, David.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2002Description: p.235-55.Subject(s): Public administration | Development aid
In:
Public AdministrationSummary: This article presents a case study of performance measurment in the United States Agency for International Development's (USAID's) democracy and governance program. Its purpose is to illustrate the juxtaposition (and sometimes contradication) between the high standards of causal logic and accuracy required of performance measurement, and the unitidiness involved in the `politics of democratization'. Based on USAID experiences in numerous countries, the articles concentrates on four specific themes drawn mainly from the literature on re-engineering but also from new public administration. These are: the complexity of politics; the challenge of attribution; the danger of distortive incentives; and the interrelated questions of product and process and quantitative and qualitative measures. Problems of mesurement are clearly complicated by the fact that the Agency does not deliver service directly, has limited control over its expenditures, and, in the case of democracy assistance, by the need to operate in a complex and sensitive area, across international borders and diverse political systems and cultures. The article includes a discussion of some innovative qualitatively-oriented USAID responses to these problems. - Reproduced.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 80, Issue no: 2 | Available | AR53273 |
This article presents a case study of performance measurment in the United States Agency for International Development's (USAID's) democracy and governance program. Its purpose is to illustrate the juxtaposition (and sometimes contradication) between the high standards of causal logic and accuracy required of performance measurement, and the unitidiness involved in the `politics of democratization'. Based on USAID experiences in numerous countries, the articles concentrates on four specific themes drawn mainly from the literature on re-engineering but also from new public administration. These are: the complexity of politics; the challenge of attribution; the danger of distortive incentives; and the interrelated questions of product and process and quantitative and qualitative measures. Problems of mesurement are clearly complicated by the fact that the Agency does not deliver service directly, has limited control over its expenditures, and, in the case of democracy assistance, by the need to operate in a complex and sensitive area, across international borders and diverse political systems and cultures. The article includes a discussion of some innovative qualitatively-oriented USAID responses to these problems. - Reproduced.
There are no comments for this item.