Does artificial intelligence speak our language?: A gadamerian assessment of generative language models
By: Pinell, Phillip
.
Material type: 
BookPublisher: Political Research Quarterly Description: 77(3), Sep, 2024: p.713-728.Subject(s): Generative language models, Gadamer, Artificial intelligence, Language, Democratic theory
In:
Political Research QuarterlySummary: The language argument is a classic argument for human distinctiveness that, for millenia, has been used to distinguish humans from non-human animals. Generative language models (GLMs) pose a challenge to traditional language-based models of human distinctiveness precisely because they can communicate and respond in a manner resembling humanity’s linguistic capabilities. This article asks: have GLMs acquired natural language? Employing Gadamer’s theory of language, I argue that they have not. While GLMs can reliably generate linguistic content that can be interpreted as “texts,” they lack the linguistically mediated reality that language provides. Missing from these models are four key features of a linguistic construction of reality: groundedness to the world, understanding, community, and tradition. I conclude with skepticism that GLMs can ever achieve natural language because they lack these characteristics in their linguistic development.- Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129241243038
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 77(3), Sep, 2024: p.713-728 | Available | AR133936 |
The language argument is a classic argument for human distinctiveness that, for millenia, has been used to distinguish humans from non-human animals. Generative language models (GLMs) pose a challenge to traditional language-based models of human distinctiveness precisely because they can communicate and respond in a manner resembling humanity’s linguistic capabilities. This article asks: have GLMs acquired natural language? Employing Gadamer’s theory of language, I argue that they have not. While GLMs can reliably generate linguistic content that can be interpreted as “texts,” they lack the linguistically mediated reality that language provides. Missing from these models are four key features of a linguistic construction of reality: groundedness to the world, understanding, community, and tradition. I conclude with skepticism that GLMs can ever achieve natural language because they lack these characteristics in their linguistic development.- Reproduced
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129241243038
There are no comments for this item.