What state? Political parties and non-state security provision in lebanon
By: Kelly, Stedem
.
Material type:
BookPublisher: Comparative Politics Description: 58(1), Oct, 2025: p.51-74.Subject(s): Clientelism, Lebanon, Non states actors, Policing, Security| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 58(1), Oct, 2025: p.51-74 | Available | AR137554 |
Security is the canonical public good provided by the state to its citizens. Yet, many states are incapable or unwilling to provide security in a consistent fashion across their territory. The provision of security, order, and management of crime is a crucial “good” that parties can and do offer their constituents, resulting in widespread variation in security at the neighborhood level. What explains this variation in the provision of security and local policing by political parties? Drawing on 132 semi-structured interviews conducted during eight months of fieldwork in Lebanon, this study suggests that organizational capacity is one determinant of whether political parties step into the role of security providers. It shows that maintaining robust linkages with constituent communities and party members at the local level are necessary to coordinating security measures.- Reproduced
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cuny/cp/2025/00000058/00000001/art00004


Articles
There are no comments for this item.