Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Raced-gendered electability: Support, donations, and democratic double standards for black women candidates

By: Chen, Philip and Sorensen, Ashley.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Political Research Quarterly Description: 78(3), Sep, 2025: p.942-956. In: Political Research QuarterlySummary: Scholars are consistently concerned about the relative lack of gender and racial representation in Congress. As explicitly sexist and racist attitudes have waned (though by no means disappeared) in the population, we are left searching for alternative explanations for continued representational gaps. We theorize that one driving force is a paradox among Democratic primary voters: namely, that Black women are seen both as more liberal and less electable. Using two different survey experiments, we show that, while most Democratic primary candidates benefit from perceptions of being more liberal, this cannot be said for Black women due to beliefs that they are less likely to win in the general election. These cross-cutting evaluations of Black women candidates by Democratic primary voters perpetuate representational inequities, making it more difficult for Black women to emerge victorious from Democratic primaries compared to men and White women.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129251331950?_gl=1*jn04kj*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTQxMjM4NDYzMi4xNzY4MTk2NDY2*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3NjgxOTY0NjYkbzEkZzEkdDE3NjgxOTY0NzEkajU1JGwwJGgxMTk2MTM3OTk1
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
78(3), Sep, 2025: p.942-956 Available AR137900

Scholars are consistently concerned about the relative lack of gender and racial representation in Congress. As explicitly sexist and racist attitudes have waned (though by no means disappeared) in the population, we are left searching for alternative explanations for continued representational gaps. We theorize that one driving force is a paradox among Democratic primary voters: namely, that Black women are seen both as more liberal and less electable. Using two different survey experiments, we show that, while most Democratic primary candidates benefit from perceptions of being more liberal, this cannot be said for Black women due to beliefs that they are less likely to win in the general election. These cross-cutting evaluations of Black women candidates by Democratic primary voters perpetuate representational inequities, making it more difficult for Black women to emerge victorious from Democratic primaries compared to men and White women.- Reproduced


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129251331950?_gl=1*jn04kj*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTQxMjM4NDYzMi4xNzY4MTk2NDY2*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3NjgxOTY0NjYkbzEkZzEkdDE3NjgxOTY0NzEkajU1JGwwJGgxMTk2MTM3OTk1

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha