Sanctuary in numbers or security in personal income? : Decoupling the effects of financial independence and family size on the mental health of older adults
By: Rani, Varsha and Ugargol, Allen Prabhaker
.
Material type: 
BookPublisher: Economic & Political Weekly Description: 61(9), Feb 28, 2026: p.85-91.
In:
Economic & Political WeeklySummary: India’s policy framework relies on the increasingly tenuous premise that the multigenerational household functions as a sufficient safety net. This paper critiques the conflation of household economic status with individual well-being. Using data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, we decouple the effects of financial autonomy and household structure. Stratified analysis reveals a dual reality: first, a “universal autonomy” effect, where individual income reduces distress odds across all strata, confirming that household wealth is no substitute for personal agency. Second, “sanctuary in numbers” operates as a graded necessity, existential for the poor but attenuated for the wealthy. These findings demand a paradigm shift from poverty-targeted schemes to universal social pensions that recognise financial autonomy as a distinct determinant of mental health.-Reproduced
https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/9/ageing-health-and-social-security/sanctuary-numbers-or-security-personal-income.html
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | 61(9), Feb 28, 2026: p.85-91 | Available | AR138690 |
India’s policy framework relies on the increasingly tenuous premise that the multigenerational household functions as a sufficient safety net. This paper critiques the conflation of household economic status with individual well-being. Using data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, we decouple the effects of financial autonomy and household structure. Stratified analysis reveals a dual reality: first, a “universal autonomy” effect, where individual income reduces distress odds across all strata, confirming that household wealth is no substitute for personal agency. Second, “sanctuary in numbers” operates as a graded necessity, existential for the poor but attenuated for the wealthy. These findings demand a paradigm shift from poverty-targeted schemes to universal social pensions that recognise financial autonomy as a distinct determinant of mental health.-Reproduced
https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/9/ageing-health-and-social-security/sanctuary-numbers-or-security-personal-income.html
There are no comments for this item.