Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory

By: Hodgson, Geoffrey M.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2003Description: p.159-75.Subject(s): Economics In: Cambridge Journal of EconomicsSummary: In his classic book The Hidden Persuaders, Vance Packard claimed that large corporations manipulated consumers, using advertising techniques. John Kenneth Galbraith and others have repeated a similar view. Against this Gary Becker and George Stigler have claimed that advertising is essentially informative rather than manipulative. In contrast, it is argued here that both of these opposed accounts of human agency neglect the more subtle and undesigned processes by which institutions bear upon and mould individuals. This paper proposes a concept of `reconstitutive downward causation' in which institutions act upon individual habits and dispositions. The mechanisms involved do not fall foul of past critiques of `holism' or methodological collectivism. This argument involves a rehabilitation of the concept of habit in social science, with far-reaching implications. - Reproduced.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 27, Issue no: 2 Available AR56514

In his classic book The Hidden Persuaders, Vance Packard claimed that large corporations manipulated consumers, using advertising techniques. John Kenneth Galbraith and others have repeated a similar view. Against this Gary Becker and George Stigler have claimed that advertising is essentially informative rather than manipulative. In contrast, it is argued here that both of these opposed accounts of human agency neglect the more subtle and undesigned processes by which institutions bear upon and mould individuals. This paper proposes a concept of `reconstitutive downward causation' in which institutions act upon individual habits and dispositions. The mechanisms involved do not fall foul of past critiques of `holism' or methodological collectivism. This argument involves a rehabilitation of the concept of habit in social science, with far-reaching implications. - Reproduced.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha