Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Accountability for performance in local government

By: Kluvers, Ron.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2003Description: p.57-69.Subject(s): Accountability | Local government In: Australian Journal of Public AdministrationSummary: The nature of accountability for performance in the public sector is explored in this paper by attempting to answer three questions: (1) How important is accountability for performance? (2) Which of the stakeholders consider themselves accountable for organisational performance, including contracts? (3) Does information asymmetry between stakeholders in regard to performance information affect accountability? This paper reports on research undertaken in Victorian local government based on the responses to a questionnaire by councillors and tier one and two managers. The results of the survey indicate that there is an understanding of accountability for performance, that both managers and councilors are considered to be accountable for performance but that information asymmetry and accountability relationships are problematic. - Reproduced.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 62, Issue no: 1 Available AR56538

The nature of accountability for performance in the public sector is explored in this paper by attempting to answer three questions: (1) How important is accountability for performance? (2) Which of the stakeholders consider themselves accountable for organisational performance, including contracts? (3) Does information asymmetry between stakeholders in regard to performance information affect accountability? This paper reports on research undertaken in Victorian local government based on the responses to a questionnaire by councillors and tier one and two managers. The results of the survey indicate that there is an understanding of accountability for performance, that both managers and councilors are considered to be accountable for performance but that information asymmetry and accountability relationships are problematic. - Reproduced.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha