The judicial theory of a reasonable public servant
By: Lee, Yong S.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2004Description: p.425-37.Subject(s): Civil service - United States | Civil service
In:
Public Administration ReviewSummary: Contemporary theory of the constitutionally reasonable public servant, established by the US Supreme Court in 1982 in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, is measured in reference to clearly established constitutional or statutory rights that a reasonable person would have known. In this article, the author seeks to elucidate the evolving contours of the objective reasonableness standard and examines how federal courts have applied it to gain a firsthand impression of how public officials challenged in federal courts are measuring up to the objective reasonableness standard, the author provides a snapshort of 449 recent court cases selected from two federal circuits, the Eighth and the District of Columbia circuits. He concludes that public officials in these two circuits have fared very well under the standard of objective reasonableness. the flip side is that aggrieved individual citizens must carry a heavy burden to protect their constitutional rights. - Reproduced.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 64, Issue no: 4 | Available | AR62154 |
Contemporary theory of the constitutionally reasonable public servant, established by the US Supreme Court in 1982 in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, is measured in reference to clearly established constitutional or statutory rights that a reasonable person would have known. In this article, the author seeks to elucidate the evolving contours of the objective reasonableness standard and examines how federal courts have applied it to gain a firsthand impression of how public officials challenged in federal courts are measuring up to the objective reasonableness standard, the author provides a snapshort of 449 recent court cases selected from two federal circuits, the Eighth and the District of Columbia circuits. He concludes that public officials in these two circuits have fared very well under the standard of objective reasonableness. the flip side is that aggrieved individual citizens must carry a heavy burden to protect their constitutional rights. - Reproduced.
There are no comments for this item.