Institutional dualism and international development: a revisionist interpretation of good governance
By: Brinkerhoff, Derick W.
Contributor(s): Goldsmith, Arthur A.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2005Description: p.199-224.Subject(s): Good governance | Public administration
In:
Administration and SocietySummary: This article examines the tensions, trade-offs, and complementarities between so-called good governance and bad governance in international development and draws on U.S. history to comment on current change efforts. Aid donors have ambitions plans to encourage countries to replace corrupt or closed public institutions with more accountable systems. Yet democratic or rational legal governance does not necessarily represent an improvement over ostensibly improper governance. It is important to bear in mind that certain clientelistic practices have hidden positive functions, such as giving poor people access to resources. Governance institutions are neither bad nor good in themselves; outcomes are what matter. - Reproduced.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 37, Issue no: 2 | Available | AR65317 |
This article examines the tensions, trade-offs, and complementarities between so-called good governance and bad governance in international development and draws on U.S. history to comment on current change efforts. Aid donors have ambitions plans to encourage countries to replace corrupt or closed public institutions with more accountable systems. Yet democratic or rational legal governance does not necessarily represent an improvement over ostensibly improper governance. It is important to bear in mind that certain clientelistic practices have hidden positive functions, such as giving poor people access to resources. Governance institutions are neither bad nor good in themselves; outcomes are what matter. - Reproduced.
There are no comments for this item.