Classical pragmatism does not need an upgrade: lessons for public administration
By: Shields, Patricia M.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2005Description: p.504-18.Subject(s): Public administration
In:
Administration and SocietySummary: In 2003, administration & society published Patricia Shields's "The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and public administration." Shortly thereafter, Huge Miller responded with "Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade" in the Disputatio Sine Fine section of Administration & Society. He argued that scholars like Shields, Evans, and Snider should incorporate the ideas of Richard Rorty into their scholarship, Miller's article was followed by a series 9 essays debating the merits of Dewey and Rorty for public administration. This article summarizes the debate and argues that Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade. -Reproduced.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 37, Issue no: 4 | Available | AR68197 |
In 2003, administration & society published Patricia Shields's "The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and public administration." Shortly thereafter, Huge Miller responded with "Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade" in the Disputatio Sine Fine section of Administration & Society. He argued that scholars like Shields, Evans, and Snider should incorporate the ideas of Richard Rorty into their scholarship, Miller's article was followed by a series 9 essays debating the merits of Dewey and Rorty for public administration. This article summarizes the debate and argues that Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade. -Reproduced.
There are no comments for this item.