AESOP with variations: civil service competency as a case of German tortoise and British hare?
By: Hood, Christopher.
Contributor(s): Lodge, Martain.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2005Description: p.805-22.Subject(s): Civil service
In:
Public AdministrationSummary: Among the most widely used stereotypes in the contemporary literature on public management reform is to portrary German administrative policy as that of a slow-moving `tortoise' in contrast to the fast-moving reform `hare'. Taking civil service competency as a point of analysis, this article questions the validity of these widely held assumptions. It does so in three steps. Following a brief comparative narrative of competency initiatives in the German and British higher civil services, the article explores to what extent the observed `Aesop with variation' pattern can be explained. It suggests that the variations can only to a limited extent be explained by `civil service competency exceptionalism' and that therefore seems to be something wrong with the way that Germany and the UK are conventionally categorized in the international public management reform literature. - Reproduced.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 83, Issue no: 4 | Available | AR69886 |
Among the most widely used stereotypes in the contemporary literature on public management reform is to portrary German administrative policy as that of a slow-moving `tortoise' in contrast to the fast-moving reform `hare'. Taking civil service competency as a point of analysis, this article questions the validity of these widely held assumptions. It does so in three steps. Following a brief comparative narrative of competency initiatives in the German and British higher civil services, the article explores to what extent the observed `Aesop with variation' pattern can be explained. It suggests that the variations can only to a limited extent be explained by `civil service competency exceptionalism' and that therefore seems to be something wrong with the way that Germany and the UK are conventionally categorized in the international public management reform literature. - Reproduced.
There are no comments for this item.