Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Four challenges to accountability in contemporary public administration: lessons from the United States and China

By: Chan, Hon S.
Contributor(s): Rosenbloom, David H.
Material type: materialTypeLabelArticlePublisher: 2010Description: p.11-33.Subject(s): Administrative reform - United States | Accountability - United States | Public administration - United States | Administrative reform - China | Accountability - China | Public administration - China | Public administration In: Administration and SocietySummary: Using the Romzek-Dubnick typology of accountability, the authors analyze challenges that reinvention and new public management reforms in the United States and China present with regard to maintaining legal controls, protecting non-mission-based administrative objectives, pursuing public values, and sustaining hierarchical authority. The authors show that reforms - especially outsourcing and results orientation - have very different consequences in the dissimilar U.S. and Chinese legal and political settings. The analysis contributes to those Public administrative theories holding that when it comes to reform, law and politics matter, and that even when administrative problems are similar across nations, their solutions may differ. - Reproduced.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode
Articles Articles Indian Institute of Public Administration
Volume no: 42, Issue no: 1 Available AR87101

Using the Romzek-Dubnick typology of accountability, the authors analyze challenges that reinvention and new public management reforms in the United States and China present with regard to maintaining legal controls, protecting non-mission-based administrative objectives, pursuing public values, and sustaining hierarchical authority. The authors show that reforms - especially outsourcing and results orientation - have very different consequences in the dissimilar U.S. and Chinese legal and political settings. The analysis contributes to those Public administrative theories holding that when it comes to reform, law and politics matter, and that even when administrative problems are similar across nations, their solutions may differ. - Reproduced.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha