The oath of office as public value guardian
By: Rutgers, Mark R.
Material type:
ArticlePublisher: 2010Description: p.428-44.Subject(s): Public administration
In:
American Review of Public AdministrationSummary: The oath of office is perhaps the ultimate means to set public office apart: Public functionaries in most countries have to swear to let public interests prevail over private concerns. This seems at odds with the prevailing liberal/managerial idea that public and private employment is not distinct at all. The oath of office establishes a moral commitment to the office that transcends a contractual, managerial, and/or legal approach to public authority. It signifies the guardianship of public officers and links personal conscience with public values and public interests. This article concludes that we should guard against using an oath of office as a remedy against increased reliance on private interests and mo tivations; rather the latter may endanger a public service ethics and annul any meaning and function an oath may still represent to begin with. - Reproduced.
| Item type | Current location | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Articles
|
Indian Institute of Public Administration | Volume no: 40, Issue no: 4 | Available | AR88252 |
The oath of office is perhaps the ultimate means to set public office apart: Public functionaries in most countries have to swear to let public interests prevail over private concerns. This seems at odds with the prevailing liberal/managerial idea that public and private employment is not distinct at all. The oath of office establishes a moral commitment to the office that transcends a contractual, managerial, and/or legal approach to public authority. It signifies the guardianship of public officers and links personal conscience with public values and public interests. This article concludes that we should guard against using an oath of office as a remedy against increased reliance on private interests and mo tivations; rather the latter may endanger a public service ethics and annul any meaning and function an oath may still represent to begin with. - Reproduced.
There are no comments for this item.