01436pab a2200169 454500 180718b2015 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d Feldman, Daniel L. The legitimacy of U.S. government agency power 2015 p.75-84. Jan-Feb A synthesis of the work of two political and legal scholars, John Rohr and Lon Fuller, properly balances constitutional and managerial values, supplementing other theories that offer useful but insufficient support for American government agency legitimacy. Agencies reflecting that balance would strengthen their legitimacy a particularly valuable goal in an era of low confidence in American government. Rohr's focus on the constitutional oath of office and American regime values, and Fuller's insistence that law must serve human needs, leave a great deal indeterminate and discretionary but nevertheless set boundaries. Bureaucrats who risked or sacrificed their jobs to avoid transgressing those boundaries offer models of loyalty to the Rohr-Fuller balance of values. The behavior of officials in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in thwarting measures that could have averted the financial crisis of 2007 offers a model of bureaucrats who violated those boundaries. - Reproduced. Civil service - Unite States Civil service Public Administration Review 108333 108328 108328 0 0 0 0 IIPA IIPA 2018-07-19 Volume no: 75, Issue no: 1 AR108793 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 AR