01631pab a2200193 454500008004000000100002000040245007400060260000900134300001500143362000800158520102300166650002001189650002601209700002201235773004501257909001101302999001901313952010501332180718b2015   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aGraaf, Gjalt de  aGood governance: performance values and procedural values in conflict  c2015  ap.635-652.  aNov  aGood governance codes usually end with a list of public values no one could oppose. A recurrent issue is that not all of these values however desirable they are can be achieved at the same time. With its focus on performance and procedural values of governance, this article zooms in on the conflict between two different types of values, signifying and exemplifying how output and outcome on one hand and the process of governance on the other may coincide or collide. The main research question is, What is the nature of value conflict in public governance and what specific conflicts between performance and procedural values do public actors perceive? A literature review and two case studies involving aldermen and the most senior public administrators in public governance set out to answer these questions. The most frequently perceived conflict is between lawfulness and transparency in procedure, on one hand, and the attainment of effectiveness and efficiency as performance values on the other.- Reproduced.  aGood governance  aPublic administration  aPaanakker, Hester  aAmerican Review of Public Administration  a110146  c110141d110141  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 45, Issue no: 6pAR110606r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR