01533pab a2200157 454500 180718b2017 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d Schneider, Aaron Social entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, collectivism and everything in between: prototypes and continuous dimensions 2017 p.421-431. May-Jun This article uses prototypes and continuous dimensions to place social entrepreneurship in relation to other organizational forms. This approach is more fruitful than classical attempts to stipulate essential characteristics and establish boundaries. A prototype and continuous dimension approach allows consideration of the way social entrepreneurship functions similarly to and differently from related concepts, such as traditional entrepreneurship, public social services, and collectivism. These categories can be distinguished according to the degree to which control over the way value is created, allocated, and distributed occurs socially or entrepreneurially. This approach offers the additional advantage of making the concept more precise, as subdimensions clarify the relationship to practices such as volunteerism and theories such as antidevelopment. By mapping the network of organizational forms in which social entrepreneurship can be located, we can focus on the viability and advisability of different ways of solving social problems. - Reproduced. Entrepreneurs Public Administration Review 115106 115100 115100 0 0 0 0 IIPA IIPA 2018-07-19 Volume no: 77, Issue no: 3 AR115566 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 AR