01358pab a2200193 454500008004000000100001600040245011700056260000900173300001500182362000800197520070200205650002700907650002600934650001800960773005100978909001101029999001901040952010501059180718b2017   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aHu, Chunyan  aAccountability of public servants under dominant political settlements of China: effects, challenges, and issues  c2017  ap.240-255.  aFeb  aSome scholars think that accountability is attainable only under the electoral political system. However, it is argued that China could achieve some weak accountability even without general election system. How could this be achieved in China? The paper attempts to analyze this question with the following steps: first, it describes the specific accountability system by categorizing different approaches based on four dimensions, then focuses on the impacts that these approaches would have, which are based on finance, fairness and efficiency. It is concluded that under a dominant political settlement, only weak accountability exists in China, not real or strong accountability. - Reproduced.  aAccountability - China  aCivil service - China  aCivil service  aInternational Journal of Public Administration  a115317  c115311d115311  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 40, Issue no: 3pAR115777r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR