01318pab a2200193 454500008004000000100001400040245006500054260000900119300001500128362000800143520071100151650003400862650002600896700002500922773004200947909001100989999001901000952010501019180718b2017   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aMei, Ciqi  aThe dilemma of "managing for results" in China: won't let go  c2017  ap.203-216.  aAug  aWhile China is not often thought of as a prime location for implementation of "managing for results" mechanisms of New Public Management, in fact, the reform era leadership-consistent with implementation of many market mechanisms in the economyﾗinitiated cadre management principles imbued with results-based techniques. This article discusses how dilemmas inherent in MFR principles play out in China's institutional context. It examines an understudied "punishing for results" technique employed in China, the "hold-to-account" system, and demonstrates how this punishment technique reveals inherent dilemmas that also can be expected if applied in other state-centric developing countries. - Reproduce  aPublic administration - China  aPublic administration  aPearson, Margaret M.  aPublic Administration and Development  a115749  c115743d115743  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 37, Issue no: 3pAR116209r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR