01647pab a2200169 454500008004000000100002400040245009500064260000900159300001500168520108900183650002601272650001801298773002601316909001101342999001901353952010501372180718b2017   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aSchuster, Christian  aLegal reform need not come first: merit-based civil service management in law and practice  c2017  ap.571-588.  aIntroducing merit recruitment of public servants is a central good governance reform. To move towards merit in practice, legislation which mandates merit recruitment is considered a necessary but insufficient first step by many scholars and practitioners. Merit-based civil service legislation should thus be sought before reform in practice. This article challenges this reasoning. It argues that merit laws are neither sufficient nor necessary: they leave the incumbent's possibility frontier for patronage and meritocracy in practice unaffected. Large- and small-n evidence supports this assertion. Analyses of an original dataset of coded civil service legislation in 117 countries from 1975 to 2015 suggest that countries can attain meritocratic recruitment with and without legal merit requirements. Subsequently, a comparison of Paraguay and the Dominican Republic provides micro-evidence for the underlying mechanism. Conventional wisdom about the sequencing of governance reforms in developing countries may thus be misleading: legal reform need not come first. - Reproduced.  aAdministrative reform  aCivil service  aPublic Administration  a116283  c116277d116277  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 95, Issue no: 3pAR116743r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR