<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02218pab a2200169 454500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">180718b2017   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gustafson, Per</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Understanding participatory governance: an analysis of participants' motives for participation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2017</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p.538-549.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="362" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Jul</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Despite the growing body of literature on participatory and collaborative governance, little is known about citizens' motives  for participation in such new governance arrangements. The present article argues that knowledge about these motives is  essential for understanding the quality and nature of participatory governance and its potential contribution to the overall  political and administrative system. Survey data were used to explore participants' motives for participating in a large-scale  urban renewal program in Stockholm, Sweden. The program was neighborhood-based, characterized by self-selected and  repeated participation, and designed to influence local decisions on the use of public resources. Three types of motives  were identified among the participants: (a) Common good motives concerned improving the neighborhood in general and  contributing knowledge and competence. (b) Self-interest motives reflected a desire to improve one's own political efficacy  and to promote the interest of one's own group or family. (c) Professional competence motives represented a largely  apolitical type of motive, often based on a professional role. Different motives were expressed by different categories of  participants and were also associated with different perceptions concerning program outcomes. Further analysis suggested  that participatory governance may represent both an opportunity for marginalized groups to empower themselves and  an opportunity for more privileged groups to act as local &#xFF93;citizen representatives&#xFF94; and articulate the interests of their  neighborhoods. These findings call for a more complex understanding of the role and potential benefits of participatory  governance. - Reprodu</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Participatory development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hertting, Nils</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">American Review of Public Administration</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">116314</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">116308</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">116308</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">Volume no: 47, Issue no: 5</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR116774</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
