<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Western ministries of defence: rules for organisational change</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Kronenberg, Vernon J.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Earnshaw, Paul</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The author describes that much of the comparative polities literature seeks the development of models that can be applied cross-nationally and to other time periods. Cross-national comparisons of five Western countries have been conducted to identify some covarying patterns of changes in top-leveldefence organisations. The fivecountries studied over the 40-year period 1945-85 are Aurstralia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States. Two types of change events were identified the outcomes of decentralising decisions. Four rules are lested: in the areas of politics, defence budgets, state of conflict, and coalition formation. Rule 1 posits the existence of a correlation between the type of</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic> Defence, National</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Organisational Change</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Austration Journal of Public Administration</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
