<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Research-based versus experiential knowledge in public policy making</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Lee-Joy Cheng</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Each policy is in need of knowledge. But both the research community and the government-user agencies appear to agree on the conclusion that social research is underused or misused. In the real world, experiential knowledge usually has had a greater impact on public policy-making than research-based knowledge. Under such circumstances, how to apply ordinary knowledge and research-based knowledge successfully to the policy making process became the primary concern in the field of knowledge utilization. This essay is organized into the following sections: conceptions of knowledge and the relation between research-based and experiential knowledge; types of knowledge utilization; theoretical perspectives on kno</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic> Public Policy</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Public Administration</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Chinese Public Administration Review</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
