01337pab a2200193 454500008004000000100003100040245007500071260000900146300001300155362001100168520072600179650002900905650003600934700001500970773002700985909001001012999001701022952010401039180718b1995   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aKlyza, Christopher McGrory  aPrivileged ideas and state interestsbbombs, trees and state autonomy.  c1995  ap.203-17  aSummer  a"The puzzle that intrigues us is the source of interests that guide the state in instances of state autonomy. We argue that one important source of these interests is ideas: When relative state autonomy exists over long periods of time, there is a strong likelihood of a privileged idea that informs state interests. State actors direct state policy during autonomous periods by adopting and privileging particular ideas (institutionalization), resulting in policy outcomes reflecting these now privileged ideas. This argument is examined in two case studies: nuclear weapons targeting since World War II, guided by counterforce, and federal public lands forestry policy since 1900, guided by technocratic utilitarianism"  aAutonomy - United States  aPublic interest - United States  aMlyn, Eric  aPolicy Studies Journal  a29621  c29621d29621  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 23, Issue no: 2pAR29761r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR