01474pab a2200181 454500008004000000100001500040245007700055260000900132300001300141362000800154520087300162650005001035650003401085773004201119909001001161999001701171952010401188180718b1996   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aBlore, Ian  aHow useful to decision-makers is contingent valuation of the environment  c1996  ap.215-32  aAug  aContingent valuation, as a method that attempts to estimate monetary values for public goods, excites passionate advocacy or resistance. This article summarizes and examines some of the criticisms of contingent valuation and concludes that its approach is essentially the same as any policy analytic method. It is argued that the language of contingent valuation needs radical reform for it to be readily accessible to practitioners, yet it does offer one escape from the lack of rigour of much of the environmental debate. Whatever the faults of contingent valuation methods, they do involve the public in a dialogue with `experts'. Any means that gives voice to the public in an age of public policy-making by managers, consultants, professional politicians, large firms and interest group leaders is at least an antidote to environmental managerialism. - Reproduced  aEnvironmental planning policy - United States  aEnvironmental planning policy  aPublic Administration and Development  a32090  c32090d32090  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 16, Issue no: 3pAR32280r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR