<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Improving public sector employee performance: the Philippine setting</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Juridico, Elmor</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xu|</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>1995</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng </languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>p.80-95</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This article briefly chronicles the history of performance evaluation system in the Philippines, both at the executive level as well as in the rank-and-file. In particular it describe the development of performance indicators for rank and file employees and executives; discuss some issues and problems relating to performance evaluation; analyse how performance evaluation is used for purposes of rewards and sanctions; look at the usefulness and applicability of Total Quality Management (TQM) as a human resources management intervention in the Philippine context; and finally assess the prospects for a truly effective performance appraisal system in the bureaucracy</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Civil service - Philippine</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Civil service</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Asian Review of Public Administration</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
