01636pab a2200193 454500008004000000100002100040245008300061260000900144300001200153362001200165520103300177650003401210650001601244650001801260773003301278909001001311999001701321952010401338180718b1997   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aStehr, Steven D.  aTop bureaucrats and the distribution of influence in Reagan's executive branch  c1997  ap.75-81  aJan-Feb  aHow did career executives think influence was distributed in their agencies during the Reagan administration? Who would top bureaucrats have preferred to exercise influence? Which actors did career executives believe had too much influence and which too little? This article investigates the attitudes of a sample of career members of the senior executive service regarding these questions. The dominant view of presidential-bureaucratic relations in the public administration literature emphasizes the influence exercised by bureaucrats, key members of Congress, and representatives of interest groups at the expense of hierarchical guidance by agents of the president. The findings reported here suggest that top bureaucrats (1) thought that political appointees were very influential in their agencies and, (2) wanted more influence to be exercised by key political executives. The Reagan team's administrative strategy was apparently successful in gaining the support of top members of the higher civil service. - Reproduced  aCivil service - United States  aBureaucracy  aCivil service  aPublic Administration Review  a33362  c33362d33362  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 57, Issue no: 1pAR33584r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR