01300pab a2200169 454500 180718b1997 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d Farmer, David John Leopards in the temple: bureaucracy and the limits of the in-between 1997 p.507-28 Nov This article examines a core problematic of bureaucracy. It suggests that the study of bureaucracy should make a clearer nonbureaucratic turn, focusing appropriately on what is described as the in-between. Analysis of structural limits of the in-between - hierarchy and lateralization - should center on the nonbureaucratic. Structure is not the central issue. Rather, structure is a surrogate for competing manifest and latent nonbureaucratic perspectives. Hierarchy is a surrogate not only for a rational order of justice but also for the feasibility of epistemological certainty. Lateralaization is a surrogate not only for human autonomy but also for skepticism and hesitation in knowing. The study of bureaucracy cannot be limited satisfactorily to "bureaucratic man." Rather, humans are irreducibly bio-psycho-spirituo-social-cultural beings. - Reproduced Bureaucracy Farmer, Rosemary L. Administration and Society 37371 37371 37371 0 0 0 0 IIPA IIPA 2018-07-19 Volume no: 29, Issue no: 5 AR37703 2018-07-19 2018-07-19 AR