01416pab a2200181 454500008004000000100002300040245007300063260000900136300001300145362000800158520086600166650001601032700002401048773003101072909001001103999001701113952010401130180718b1997   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aFarmer, David John  aLeopards in the temple: bureaucracy and the limits of the in-between  c1997  ap.507-28  aNov  aThis article examines a core problematic of bureaucracy. It suggests that the study of bureaucracy should make a clearer nonbureaucratic turn, focusing appropriately on what is described as the in-between. Analysis of structural limits of the in-between - hierarchy and lateralization - should center on the nonbureaucratic. Structure is not the central issue. Rather, structure is a surrogate for competing manifest and latent nonbureaucratic perspectives. Hierarchy is a surrogate not only for a rational order of justice but also for the feasibility of epistemological certainty. Lateralaization is a surrogate not only for human autonomy but also for skepticism and hesitation in knowing. The study of bureaucracy cannot be limited satisfactorily to "bureaucratic man." Rather, humans are irreducibly bio-psycho-spirituo-social-cultural beings. - Reproduced  aBureaucracy  aFarmer, Rosemary L.  aAdministration and Society  a37371  c37371d37371  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 29, Issue no: 5pAR37703r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR