01267pab a2200205 454500008004000000100002700040245008900067260000900156300001200165362000800177520065100185650001000836650001900846650002400865650002000889773002100909909001000930999001700940952010400957180718b1999   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aVamvakidis, Athanasios  aRegional trade agreement or broad liberalization: which path leads to faster growth?  c1999  ap.42-68  aMar  aShould a closed economy open its trade to all countries or limit itself to participation in regional trade agreements (RTAs)? Based on time-series evidence for a data set for 1950-92, this paper estimates and compares the growth performance of countries that liberalized broadly and that of those that joined an RTA. The comparisons show that economies grew faster after broad liberalization, in both the short and the long run, but slower after participation in an RTA. Economies also had higher investment shares after broad liberalization, but lower ones after joining an RTA. The policy implications support broad liberalization. - Reproduced  aTrade  aLiberalization  aInternational trade  aEconomic growth  aIMF Staff Papers  a41931  c41931d41931  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 46, Issue no: 1pAR42308r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR