<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Judicial reforms in India: Some aspects</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Sachar, Rajinder</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xu|</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>1999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng </languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>p.472-478.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Picking up three aspects - Transfers of High Court judges, appointment of High Court judges, and Satish Sharma case review - the author analytically examines the logic behind the policy of such transfers and appointments, their disadvantages and implications for our judicial system, and the need for a Judicial Commission alongwith suggestions regarding its composition. Highly critical of judgement of Review Court on Capt. Satish Sharma's case, he points out how this judgement is against the established law on Public Interest Litigation in India. - Reproduced</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Judiciary - India</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Judiciary</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Indian Journal of Public Administration</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
